A Blog dedicated to Declutter 3GPP specifications

Wednesday, November 25, 2020

NR-U Physical Frame structure (Candidates)


NR-Unlicensed is still in the study phase with barely any work done on the TS. It is expected that by 2022 (so Release 18) we may see some specification for the 6GHz band in Europe. As of now, only potential candidates for NR-U implementation can be guessed. 

Physical layer aspects

NR-U supports both Type-A and Type-B mapping already supported in NR.

Initial active DL/UL BWP is approximately 20MHz for 5GHz band, though the final value will be quantized to number of PRBs. Initial active DL/UL BWP is approximately 20MHz for 6GHz band if similar channelization as 5GHz band is used for 6GHz band.

Frame structure

Single and multiple DL to UL and UL to DL switching points within a shared gNB COT is identified to be beneficial and can be supported.

For NR-U DL operation, it is identified that being able to operate all DL signal/channels with the same numerology for a carrier and at least for intra-band CA on serving cells on unlicensed bands has at least the following benefits (at least for standalone operation)

-    Lower implementation complexity (e.g., a single FFT, no switching gaps)

-    Lower specification impact

-    No need for gaps for measurements on frequencies with a configured serving cell in unlicensed bands

For NR-U UL operation, it is identified that being able to operate all UL signal/channels (except PRACH) with the same numerology for a carrier and at least for intra-band CA on serving cells on unlicensed bands has at least the following benefits:

-    Lower implementation complexity (e.g., a single FFT, no switching gaps)

-    Lower specification impact

-    Common interlace structure

-    No need for gaps for transmission of SRS on a configured serving cell in unlicensed bands

For unlicensed PCell, the UE assumes single SSB numerology per band.

It has been identified to be beneficial for the NR-U design to not require the gNB to change a pre-determined TBS for a PDSCH transmission depending on the LBT outcome, at least when the PDSCH is transmitted at the beginning of the gNB's COT.

The following options have been identified as possible candidates for PDSCH transmission in the partial slot at least for the first PDSCH(s) transmitted in the DL transmission burst. The options are not mutually exclusive.

-    Option 1: PDSCH(s) as in Rel-15 NR

-    Option 2: Punctured PDSCH depending on LBT outcome

-    Option 3: PDSCH mapping type B with durations other than 2/4/7 symbols

-    Option 4: PDSCH across slot boundary

In addition to the functionalities provided by DCI format 2_0 in Rel-15 NR, indication of the COT structure in the time domain has been identified as being beneficial.

It has been identified to be beneficial for the NR-U design to not require the UE to change a granted TBS for a PUSCH transmission depending on the LBT outcome.

The following options have been identified as possible candidate at least for the first PUSCH(s) transmitted in the UL transmission burst.

-    Option 1: PUSCH(s) as in Rel-15 NR

-    Option 2: Multiple starting positions in one or multiple slot(s) are allowed for PUSCH(s) scheduled by a single UL grant (i.e., not a configured grant) and one of the multiple PUSCH starting positions can be decided depending on LBT outcome.

For above options, the ending position of the PUSCH is fixed as indicated by the UL grant.

 

It has been identified that FBE operation for the scenario where it is guaranteed that LBE nodes are absent on a long term basis (e.g., by level of regulation) and FBE gNBs are synchronized can achieve the following: Ability to use frequency reuse factor 1; Lower complexity for channel access due to lack of necessity to perform random backoff.

It is noted that this does not imply that LBE does not have benefits in similar scenarios although there are differences between the two modes of operation. It is also noted that FBE may also have some disadvantages compared to other modes of operation such as LBE, e.g., a fixed overhead for idle time during a frame.

For wideband operation for both DL and UL,

-    Bandwidth larger than 20 MHz can be supported with multiple serving cells.

-    NR-U should support that a serving cell can be configured with bandwidth larger than 20 MHz.

For DL operation, the following options for BWP-based operation within a carrier with bandwidth larger than 20 MHz can be considered.

-    Option 1a: Multiple BWPs configured, multiple BWPs activated, transmission of PDSCH on one or more BWPs

-    Option 1b: Multiple BWPs configured, multiple BWPs activated, transmission of PDSCH on single BWP

-    Option 2: Multiple BWPs can be configured, single BWP activated, gNB transmits PDSCH on a single BWP if CCA is successful at gNB for the whole BWP

-    Option 3: Multiple BWPs can be configured, single BWP activated, gNB transmits PDSCH on parts or whole of single BWP where CCA is successful at gNB

For UL operation, the following options for BWP-based operation within a carrier with bandwidth larger than 20 MHz can be considered.

-    Option 1a: Multiple BWPs configured, multiple BWPs activated, transmission of PUSCH on one or more BWPs

-    Option 1b: Multiple BWPs configured, multiple BWPs activated, transmission of PUSCH on single BWP

-    Option 2: Multiple BWPs can be configured, single BWP activated, UE transmits PUSCH on a single BWP if CCA is successful at UE for the whole BWP

-    Option 3: Multiple BWPs can be configured, single BWP activated, UE transmits PUSCH on parts or whole of single BWP where CCA is successful at UE

CCA is declared to be successful or not in multiples of 20 MHz.


Related:

  1. NR-U Inactive and Idle procedures (Candidates)
  2. NR-U Control plane (Candidates)

  3. NR-U Layer 2 (Candidates)

  4. NR-U Physical layer channel designs(Candidates)

  5. NR-U Channel Access Schemes (Candidates)

0 comments:

Post a Comment